From an ethical standpoint, this presents a dilemma because companies are traditionally expected to remain neutral when it comes to politics so as not to alienate or antagonize potential customers who may disagree with the stance being taken. Therefore companies must make sure they weigh all options carefully before deciding whether or not getting involved politically is worth the risk. In Nike’s case, however, they opted for full transparency by clearly stating that their decision was meant to provoke thought and inspire change rather than endorse any specific point of view – ultimately leading them away from an ethically-questionable situation while still managing to convey their desired message.
Nike, as many other companies like Tesla, Lyft, Airbnb, Starbucks, along with numerous tech giants have raised their voice related to political concerns. The information below offers some background and overviews of Nike’s controversial ad. After critically reflection on the sources, post your response to the following question: Is an organization taking a political stand an ethical dilemma? If so why, if not why not? Draw on course vocabulary to support your thoughts.
Ultimately speaking out on controversial topics involves risk but when done properly can also lead to increased brand loyalty among those who support the cause being championed – making it one possible path towards achieving success in today’s increasingly interconnected world where corporate ethics play a major role in determining public perception.