[Solution]The author of “Under used Parks work to create Awareness, Access’ takes the position that the underused parks discussed in the article deserve more visitors. How does he distinguish this position from that of others who might argue that it’s best for these parks to remain “hidden gems”?

The author of “Underused Parks Work to Create Awareness, Access” takes the position that underused parks should be given more attention and visitors. He distinguishes this position from others by noting the potential benefits such parks can provide to their communities if they are given more awareness and access. He notes that while some may believe that these parks should remain “hidden gems,” doing so would mean missing out on many opportunities for recreation, environmental protection, and economic development.

The author of “Under used Parks work to create Awareness, Access’ takes the position that the underused parks discussed in the article deserve more visitors. How does he distinguish this position from that of others who might argue that it’s best for these parks to remain “hidden gems”?

The author acknowledges that there is a certain appeal to leaving these parks untouched as “hidden gems” but he argues against this idea based on two main points. The first point is that actively promoting these underused spaces can improve local quality of life in a variety of ways. He cites examples of how efforts to make these spaces accessible via public transportation or improved pathways can help increase physical activity within neighborhoods which leads to improved health outcomes such as increased levels of fitness and reduced rates of diabetes and heart disease among residents. Additionally he notes how increasing access could also reduce crime rates in areas where people feel safe enough to spend time outdoors or even use it for recreational activities like bird watching or nature walks. Finally he also states how making a park more visible has been shown to increase property values which further encourages investment in an area leading further economic development opportunities nearby as well.

The second point he argues against keeping them hidden is due to the environmental benefits they offer when made available for local communities especially since most urban populations lack access green space due overcrowding or other factors such as cost associated with using private outdoor facilities instead. By encouraging people to visit and use such outdoor venues they not only have access much needed fresh air but also have an opportunity learn about the plants and wildlife native to their areas potentially sparking interest in conservation initiatives later down the line thus helping preserve biodiversity long term .

In conclusion, the author does an excellent job distinguishing his argument from those who may see value in leaving small urban parks undiscovered saying ultimately when done right increased awareness and accessibility open up new possibilities across social, economic ,and environmental fronts allowing them reap maximum benefit from assets already existing at hand all while preserving its natural beauty for future generations .